Comparative leaching of uranium from low-permeability sandstone using KMnO4 vs. H2O2: Mineralogical responses and implications for in-situ recovery

Yuanqing Fan; Hao Song; Guoqiang Dong; Nan Gan; Wensheng Liao; Fei Lyu; Chengjiang Zhang; Yahui Tan; Dian Xiao

doi:10.31035/cg2025359

Articles in press have been peer-reviewed and accepted, which are not yet edited and assigned to volumes/issues, but are citable by Digital Object Identifier (DOI).

Yuanqing Fan, Hao Song, Guoqiang Dong, Nan Gan, Wensheng Liao, Fei Lyu, Chengjiang Zhang, Yahui Tan, Dian Xiao. 2026. Comparative leaching of uranium from low-permeability sandstone using KMnO4 vs. H2O2: Mineralogical responses and implications for in-situ recovery. China Geology. doi: 10.31035/cg2025359.

Citation: Yuanqing Fan, Hao Song, Guoqiang Dong, Nan Gan, Wensheng Liao, Fei Lyu, Chengjiang Zhang, Yahui Tan, Dian Xiao. 2026. Comparative leaching of uranium from low-permeability sandstone using KMnO4 vs. H2O2: Mineralogical responses and implications for in-situ recovery. China Geology. doi: 10.31035/cg2025359.

Citation:

Comparative leaching of uranium from low-permeability sandstone using KMnO₄ vs. H₂O₂: Mineralogical responses and implications for in-situ recovery

Abstract

Highlights

FullText(HTML)

References(49)

Relative Articles

Supplements (0)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Comparative leaching of uranium from low-permeability sandstone using KMnO4 vs. H2O2: Mineralogical responses and implications for in-situ recovery

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

Comparative leaching of uranium from low-permeability sandstone using KMnO₄ vs. H₂O₂: Mineralogical responses and implications for in-situ recovery